“EBOLA DOC’S CONDITION DOWNGRADED TO ‘IDIOTIC’”   This was the headline from an article written recently by America’s beloved Christian conservative, Ann Coulter. Otherwise known as the Wicked Witch of the West to the rest of us.

I do not like to pick on my fellow females, but she has asked for a verbal lashing after she vomited up this column here yesterday. Take a read and then we’ll talk.

You might know that I’m not a big fan of mission trips. All those goody-two-shoes who think they’re off to see the miscreant heathens when, in reality, they just want to score some brownie points with the guy “upstairs.” However, this trip is different. Brantly and Writebol were helping their fellow man, who are desperately in need of their expertise, at the risk of their own health. If their motive to help is because god called them to do it or they’re getting paid or they just want to help, it doesn’t really matter, does it? They knew they’d be putting their lives in danger in order to help others. Now I know many of these Christian folks believe they’ll have special protections as part of god’s sales force, but the fact is, they’re still willing to take the chance to help others. They’re better men than me. So kudos to them, no matter what they call themselves or what they believe in.

Speaking of names we call people, Brantly and Writebol aren’t the types of Christians Coulter says would be “called homophobes, racists, sexists and bigots” in the US. No, those types of people wouldn’t be brave enough to reach out and help; instead, they’d be on the media circuit waving their blond hair about and spewing more hate.

Ebola has been around for a while—since 1976. There have been 1,711 cases this year with 932 deaths. That’s about a 56 percent death rate for the year. It’s a nasty virus that causes high fever and hemorrhaging. But it’s not an airborne disease and human transmission, according to WHO, is spread: “from direct contact (through broken skin or mucous membranes) with the blood, secretions, organs or other bodily fluids of infected people, and indirect contact with environments contaminated with such fluids.”

What did Jesus say? Help thy neighbors. Don’t judge. Share. Be kind. Those sorts of things, right?

I find it very f*cking hypocritical to say, “If he [Brantly] had provided health care for the uninsured editors, writers, videographers and pundits in Gotham and managed to open one set of eyes, he would have done more good than marinating himself in medieval diseases of the Third World.”

What does Coulter care about helping the uninsured? She doesn’t. She has worked against mainstream acceptance of the ACA, which has brought many of the uninsured into the safety net of the system. So saying that Brantly should have helped here at home rings really, really false. As in, ahem, bull shit.

Here in US, even in the poorest towns in our nation, we still have more than most of the world—and, for certain, access to a better healthcare system and infrastructure. All of us have access to emergency care. So I get that these folks wanted to help where they are really needed.

Liberia, which was colonized by the US and was modeled on our government, is having a humanitarian crises. They need the rest of the world. Should kindness have boundaries? Doesn’t humanism supersede nationalism in times like this? It’s not only missionaries who are helping. The CDC, the European Commission, the Red Cross and many other charities and nations are donating funds and personnel. Spain is preparing to bring home one of its sick.

These are the things you hope humans do for each other, no matter the reason. This is what you hope our hospitals, our charities and our government do for citizens in need. Bringing home our own when they have gone abroad to help the world is what America should do.

For chrissake, this is what your Christ would want, Coulter.



  1. That female is no fellow of mine! Pick away.

  2. You are so right!

  3. Couldn’t agree more. Thank you for being a voice of reason.

  4. As I’ve been reading things about this and about the influx of children refugees, the thought I keep having is that ‘compassionate’ does not seem to be a word we can use to describe the U.S. anymore.

  5. My opinion of Ann Coulter is not printable.

  6. Ann Coulter is so obnoxious that she is not even attractive to look at!

  7. Her looks really have no baring on the situation. She is reprehensible and makes a living off of catering to the “Good ‘ol Boys” of Fox News.

  8. Wow.

    I knew it was possible to write nonsense, but this brings the act to new heights. It is so full of non sequitur that is does not even warrant an answer.

    Anyway, who is she? From what she writes, she seems to have very little world experience.

  9. I hate being that internet guy. You know the one who claims to know something, blah blah blah. Oh well screw it.
    So I thought it was funny that in her example she used “Zavala County Texas.”
    They’ve had an oil boom going on there for almost five years now. My wife is from Crystal City in Zavala County. They’re doing quite well. So Ann, that’s probably why the doctors didn’t go there. Because your data is outdated.

  10. If Ann Coulter fell into a vat of her own slime, I would not save her because she is that repugnant of a human being. She peddles hate and misinformation simply for her own aggrandizement. Granted, she doesn’t rank with some of the worst humans in history (Hitler, Stalin, or Pol Pot), but she makes America look bad every time she gets exposure. She like a living, ambulatory cesspool.

  11. I think that Coulter is even more reprehensible because she probably only believes about 10% of the garbage she spews. The rest if for attention and entertainment. She is such a revolting human being.

  12. The rest *is* for attention and entertainment. Please excuse the typo.

  13. For what it’s worth, “Ann Coulter” isn’t a real person. She’s a character. She’s a persona played by an actress, designed to entertain – and her entertainment is extremely profitable. It’s hard to say if the person Ann Coulter actually even believes the stuff that the character “Ann Coulter” says; it is so far beyond anything that a real person would think or believe it’s hard to know for sure. But at the end of the day, the character “Ann Coulter” has been designed and branded through a careful and deliberate marketing strategy to enrage people and say outrageous things, because doing that makes a LOT of money. Every time she’s on TV or sells a book saying the most ridiculous things imaginable, she’s making money. She is, like many other pop entertainers, comedians, tv hosts, and a long list of both right- and left-wing pundits, best described as: “a professional buffoon.” (Although they prefer the word “entertainer,” so I suppose it’s best to respect their wishes.)

  14. Seriously: the difference between “Ann Coulter” and “Steven Colbert” is that Steven uses a laugh track, giving his words a further level of subtext that lets everyone know he’s in on the joke. They are both incredibly bright people who are on TV saying the most outrageous things possible because it makes a LOT of money.

I'd love to hear your thoughts!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s